Saturday, October 22, 2016

A Tree and a Man Are Known by Their Fruit


The heart of Barack Obama is quite apparent in virtually everything he says and everything he does...this is perhaps among the most blatant and graphic evidences of his profound affinity for Islam.

Obama was nurtured in Islam from his childhood. Those who believe he has become a CHRISTIAN must deny the evidence to make that assertion, but those who observe him objectively can see his commitment to all things Islamic, including its goal of a "one world Islamic caliphate."

Hillary Clinton seems equally committed to Islam, not, however because of religious conviction, but because Islamic entities have financed her surge to political power.

Certainly, her "accomplishments" have not advanced her political ambitions; if anything, they would have rendered her unfit for high office. Her rise is funded by a virtually limitless money trail that flows from the coffers of the Islamic tyrants of the Middle East.

Ask yourself on election day: CAN AMERICA REMAIN FREE UNDER THE BURDEN OF FOUR MORE YEARS OF ISLAMIC INFLUENCE?


Seven hundred and seventy million dollars. That’s right, Barack Obama, John Kerry,…
joeforamerica.com|By The Right Curmudgeon


A CBS news investigation found that the Obama State Department is sending hundreds of millions of dollars to save mosques overseas — outraging taxpayer advocates and raising enormous questions about aid to potentially terror-supporting groups with U.S. foreign aid.
The United States ‘investment’ of millions to refurbish mosques as a ‘good-will effort’ in Muslim countries has upset many.


“We are spending money we don’t have. This is all on a gigantic credit card right now,” said Jared Thomas, a taxpayer advocate.

Millions more dollars have been sent to places like Cyprus. The State Department displays before and after pictures of mosques refurbished with U.S. tax dollars.

“I think it is very hard to explain to the American taxpayer right now whose having an extraordinary time paying bills and making ends meet that this is why we took this out of your paycheck, so we can fund this,” said Thomas.

The State Department declined a CBS Atlanta News request for an interview. Anchor Justin Farmer wanted to ask why are we using tax dollars to refurbish religious buildings overseas. The State Department did send CBS Atlanta News an e-mail saying that they are “fighting Islamic extremism by building relationships with Islamic leaders”.

Egyptian-American human rights activist Nonie Darwish told Farmer that trying to buy respect in the Middle East only shows our weakness.

“This part of the world has a lot of respect for power and America is not showing its power, it’s showing its appeasement. They are laughing all the way to the bank,” said Darwish.

Darwish was born in Egypt and is now a former Muslim. Darwish told Farmer that she moved to America and has written several books critical of radical Islam. Darwish said that most of the mosques in Egypt are run by extremists who have ordered former Muslims like herself to be killed.

“We are rebuilding mosques to support the radicals, not to support the moderates. We are building mosques to issue fatwas of death against people like me,” said Darwish.

Your tax dollars also fund computers and mosques in places like Tajikistan and Mali. At an ancient mud brick mosque in Mali, the State Department has provided Internet service and computer equipment to local imams.

Taxpayer watchdogs wonder how the State Department can explain paying for Internet service while Americans struggle through the worst recession in decades.

“To the average person who has probably seen their paycheck shrink and not grow, this could be an insult to them,” said Pete Sepp, President of the National Taxpayers Association.

With radical websites inciting violence and extremism worldwide, there are concerns that the taxpayer-funded Internet service could be misused.

“That is not the job of the U.S. because giving them Internet access to imams and Muslim preachers who hate America,” said Darwish.

Critics say that it is time to review funding for all federal programs that do not directly benefit taxpayers.

“We are spending money we don’t have and certainly we can cut items like this,” said Thomas.

No comments:

Post a Comment