Hypocritical Gun Protests

Congressional Democrats' Hypocritical Gun Protests by Bill Wilson

The entire gun debate in both houses of Congress is an attempt by Congressional Democrats to continue to chip away at the Second Amendment right to bear arms, own guns. They know that once a citizenship is disarmed, they can rule with impunity.

History is proof--Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, Communist China, Cuba, most third world dictatorships, and so on. You don't have to look far. But the height of hypocrisy is to blame the Orlando terrorist attack on guns. Guns don't kill without someone pulling a trigger.

And no matter how you look at it, the criminals will always find ways to get guns. Look at the US cities with the strictest gun control laws. They have the highest murder rates by those using guns.

The latest racket to disarm law abiding citizens is a bill to prevent people who are on a terrorist watch or "no fly" list from buying guns. On the surface, this sounds like a good idea. But in reality, it is obfuscation. If those people wanted guns, they would get them.

The Islamist that attacked in Orlando worked for a Homeland Security contractor. Using that logic, we should ban guns for anyone working for Homeland Security.

Banning guns from people on watch lists complicates the law. They have done no crime. Their rights are being taken away because the government has put them on a list. This is a bad precedent to set in the name of public safety. It is taking rights away for what people might be thinking.

There is a better way. Enforce the law by banning Islamic immigration.

Chapter 2 Section 212 of The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (Public Law 414), prohibits entry to the US if an Alien is a member of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches, the overthrow by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means of the US or of all forms of law, and Aliens who publish, circulate and distribute materials teaching or advocating the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US Government or of all forms of law.

Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic.

Muslims who believe the Koran is their life's guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Whether Islam is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited.

It also prohibits those who distribute literature that advocates the overthrow of our country, which would include the Koran.

Does Congress have the integrity to act? Or shall we be a nation like that in Isaiah 59:14 where, "justice is turned back, and righteousness stands afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter."

I think you know the answer.