In Neither Case

Donald Trump has not always been kind in his assessment of women. He has been crude in some of his comments about their appearance--as, perhaps one might expect, from a man who has sponsored beauty contests.

Donald Trump, a man who has not, until recently, felt the necessity of accepting CHRIST as his personal SAVIOR (perhaps because his wealth has made him believe he needs nothing he cannot provide for himself) has not always made choices in his life that reflect a Biblical viewpoint.

Bill Clinton is a man who professed CHRIST at an early age but who has lived a life of profligate behavior toward women. His affairs have been common knowledge since prior to his election as president.

Accusations against him have included that of rape. If that is true, and evidence suggests that it is, he is a man who has allowed his impulses to drive his behavior rather than allowing his faith to chart the course of his life.

In this matter, as well as in so many issues that reflect Secretary-of-State Clinton's ineptitude, carelessness and lack of patriotism, no accountability has been required by the media.

In neither case are these men's daughters responsible for their parents' actions, but one is posed the question of her father's behaviors while the other is not questioned regarding the actions of her parents.

Is this because the liberal media is, in yet another way, supporting its preferred candidate?